Arbitrum Governance Analytics: November 2024 Community Participation Report

·

We are pleased to release the inaugural ArbitrumDAO Governance Analytics Report, providing a detailed overview of key governance metrics and community insights for November 2024. This report represents a major step forward in promoting transparency and supporting informed decision-making within the ArbitrumDAO ecosystem.

Executive Summary

November 2024 presented notable changes in governance participation within ArbitrumDAO:

Voting Participation Trends

Participation Rate: Average Voting Power Cast Per Proposal

November 2024 witnessed a noticeable decline in governance participation rates across both on-chain and off-chain voting mechanisms.

Off-chain Participation:

On-chain Participation:

Unique Voters: Monthly Voting Participants

On-chain Unique Voters:

Off-chain Unique Voters:

Voting Power: Average Influence Per Proposal

On-chain Voting Power:

Off-chain Voting Power:

New Voter Acquisition

November brought 528 new on-chain voters and 437 off-chain voters. The on-chain participation saw a sharp decline from 2,488 new voters in October to just 528 in November. In contrast, off-chain participation saw a significant rise from 153 voters in October to 437 in November.

Contributing Factors

The decline in participation and voting power appears largely attributable to Devcon 2024, a major blockchain conference held in Bangkok, Thailand. Many active ArbitrumDAO delegates and contributors attended this event, limiting their availability to engage with governance proposals during November.

Voter Dynamics

Existing Voters

Analysis of voting power changes among existing voters revealed significant shifts among 40 key participants.

Voting Power Increases:

aretagov.eth:

chainlinkgod.eth:

Voting Power Decreases:

New Potential Voters

November introduced two new potential voters:

0xidant.eth:

0x8ea94a2e9c7dc84812ced896c318325b0cb40d7b:

Delegate Status Shifts

Active Delegates

Inactive Delegates

Ghost Delegates

Implications of Delegate Status Changes

The shifts in delegate status within ArbitrumDAO reveal concerning trends of reduced active participation. While there was a slight decrease in inactive delegates, a significant portion of the delegate pool remains disengaged. The increase in ghost delegates suggests a possible decrease in the total number of active participants.

Addressing these shifts is critical to enhancing decision-making efficacy and ensuring robust governance dynamics. 👉 Explore effective delegate engagement strategies to improve community participation.

Proposal Outcomes

November featured six proposals for voting: two on-chain and four off-chain.

Implications for ArbitrumDAO

The proposal outcomes revealed significant engagement challenges, with voter participation consistently below category averages. Most proposals received strong support with minimal opposition, though some, like the Minigrant Restitution, faced overwhelming disapproval reflecting community priorities and expectations.

These results underscore the need for increased voter engagement and enhanced transparency to strengthen community trust and ensure more inclusive decision-making within the DAO.

Voting Power Distribution Shifts

Votable Supply Changes

Voting Power Distribution

This redistribution highlights the importance of encouraging broader engagement to maintain a balanced governance structure. 👉 Learn more about balanced governance approaches for decentralized organizations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What caused the decline in Arbitrum governance participation in November 2024?
The primary factor was Devcon 2024 in Bangkok, which many active delegates attended. This international blockchain conference reduced availability for governance activities, resulting in lower participation rates across both on-chain and off-chain voting mechanisms.

How does delegate status affect ArbitrumDAO governance?
Delegate status significantly impacts governance effectiveness. Active delegates (65%+ participation) drive decisions, while inactive and ghost delegates reduce overall engagement. The November report showed a concerning increase in ghost delegates who never vote despite holding voting power.

What was the most significant change in voting power distribution?
The top 1-10 voters increased their share by 4.12%, consolidating influence among the largest token holders. Meanwhile, smaller voters (positions 51-200 and 501-1000) saw decreased influence, highlighting the need for broader participation to maintain balanced governance.

Why was the Minigrant Restitution proposal rejected?
The proposal faced overwhelming community disapproval, reflecting specific priorities and expectations within ArbitrumDAO. The rejection demonstrates that even with generally low participation, the community remains engaged on issues of significant importance.

How can ArbitrumDAO improve voter participation?
Strategies include better educational resources, clearer communication about proposal impacts, improved voting mechanisms, and targeted engagement programs for inactive delegates. The community might also consider incentive structures to encourage consistent participation.

What does the future hold for Arbitrum governance?
While November showed some concerning trends, the foundation remains strong. The community continues to develop mechanisms for broader participation and more effective decision-making. Future reports will track whether these measures successfully address engagement challenges.