Understanding Gasless ERC20 Token Transactions via Off-Chain Signatures

Introduction

The concept of "gasless" Ethereum transactions has gained significant attention as users seek ways to minimize network fees. While all operations on the Ethereum blockchain require gas for execution, innovative approaches allow users to delegate transaction costs to other parties. This article explores the mechanism behind gasless ERC20 token transactions using off-chain signatures, providing a clear explanation of how this method works and its practical implementation.

How Gasless Transactions Actually Work

Gasless transactions don't eliminate costs entirely but instead shift the gas burden to another party. The process involves creating cryptographic signatures off-chain that authorize specific actions, which can then be submitted by anyone willing to pay the associated gas fees. This approach maintains network security while enabling new user experiences.

The core concept involves using your private key to sign authorization for smart contract operations without actually submitting a transaction yourself. This signature can then be handed to another party who executes the transaction on your behalf, paying the gas costs themselves.

The Technical Foundation: EIP Standards

Several Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs) standardize the implementation of gasless transactions:

EIP-712: Structured Data Signing

EIP-712 provides a standard for encoding structured data that can be securely signed, making it easier to verify signatures in smart contracts. This standard ensures that signatures are tied to specific contexts, preventing replay attacks across different contracts or networks.

EIP-2612: Permit Extension for ERC-20

EIP-2612 specifically addresses the implementation of permit functions for ERC-20 tokens, allowing approvals to be made via signatures rather than transactions. This standard builds upon EIP-712 to create a consistent approach across different token implementations.

Key Components of Signature-Based Authorization

Domain Separator

The DOMAIN_SEPARATOR is a unique identifier that ensures signatures are only valid for a specific contract. It includes:

• Token contract name
• Version number
• Chain ID
• Contract address

This prevents signatures intended for one contract from being used on another, even if they have identical code.

Permit Type Hash

The PERMIT_TYPEHASH defines the specific function being authorized, including all parameter types and names. This ensures that signatures can only be used for their intended purpose.

Nonce Mechanism

Each address maintains a nonce value that increments with each used signature. This prevents replay attacks by ensuring each signature can only be used once.

Implementing the Permit Function

The permit function extends traditional ERC-20 approval mechanisms with signature verification:

function permit(
    address holder,
    address spender,
    uint256 nonce,
    uint256 expiry,
    bool allowed,
    uint8 v,
    bytes32 r,
    bytes32 s
) external;

This function verifies that:

1. The signature matches the expected parameters
2. The signature hasn't expired
3. The nonce matches the holder's current nonce
4. The signature was created by the holder

Only after all these checks pass does the function update the allowance mapping, exactly like a traditional approve call.

👉 Explore advanced implementation strategies

Creating Off-Chain Signatures

Generating valid signatures involves three main steps:

1. Domain Separation: Generate the DOMAIN_SEPARATOR using contract-specific information
2. Digest Creation: Hash the function parameters with the domain separator
3. Signature Generation: Cryptographically sign the digest using the holder's private key

This process happens entirely off-chain, requiring no gas expenditure from the signer.

Practical Benefits and Use Cases

Improved User Experience

Gasless transactions eliminate the need for users to maintain ETH for gas fees, particularly valuable for new users who might only hold ERC-20 tokens.

Delegated Operations

Services can bundle multiple operations, paying gas costs once for multiple user actions, potentially reducing overall transaction costs.

Meta-Transactions

Relayers can submit transactions on behalf of users, enabling applications to abstract away blockchain complexities from end-users.

Security Considerations

While signature-based approvals offer convenience, they introduce new security considerations:

Signature Expiration

Always implement expiry mechanisms to prevent stale signatures from being used maliciously.

Phishing Risks

Users must be educated about what they're signing, as malicious dapps might trick them into authorizing excessive allowances.

Front-running Protections

Implement nonce mechanisms to prevent signature replay attacks across different networks or contexts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What exactly are gasless transactions?
Gasless transactions allow users to authorize blockchain operations without paying gas fees themselves by creating off-chain signatures that others can execute. The gas cost is shifted to the party that submits the transaction to the network.

Are gasless transactions completely free?
No, someone still pays the gas costs. The innovation is that the user authorizing the action doesn't have to be the one paying for it, which enables new application models and user experiences.

How secure are signature-based approvals?
When properly implemented using EIP-712 standards, signature-based approvals are highly secure. The domain separation, nonce protection, and expiry mechanisms prevent most attack vectors, making them as secure as traditional transactions for most use cases.

Can any ERC-20 token support gasless transactions?
Not inherently. Tokens must implement specific permit functions following EIP-2612 standards to support signature-based approvals. Many newer tokens include this functionality, while older tokens would require upgrades.

What happens if I sign a malicious approval?
The same risks apply as with traditional approve calls. If you sign an authorization giving a malicious contract unlimited spending allowance, they can drain your tokens. Always verify what you're signing, just as you would with transactions.

Can I revoke a signature I've already created?
You cannot revoke a specific signature, but you can invalidate all pending signatures by changing your nonce (if the contract allows it) or by revoking allowances through traditional approve calls with zero values.

Implementation Best Practices

When implementing gasless functionality:

1. Follow Established Standards: Use EIP-2612 as a reference implementation to ensure compatibility with existing infrastructure
2. Clear User Interfaces: When requesting signatures, clearly display what users are authorizing
3. Graceful Degradation: Maintain traditional approve functions for wallets that don't support signature-based approvals
4. Testing: Thoroughly test signature generation and verification across different scenarios

👉 View real-time development tools

Conclusion

Gasless transactions using off-chain signatures represent a significant advancement in Ethereum user experience. By separating authorization from execution, this pattern enables new application models while maintaining blockchain security guarantees. While the implementation requires careful attention to EIP standards and security considerations, the benefits for end-users make this approach increasingly important in the Ethereum ecosystem.

The technique shifts rather than eliminates gas costs, but this shift enables valuable use cases where users shouldn't need to worry about gas management. As the ecosystem continues to evolve, signature-based authorization will likely become standard across most token implementations, reducing friction for new users while enabling more sophisticated DeFi applications.